What We Can Learn from Causal Conditional Reasoning about the Naïve Understanding of Causality
نویسنده
چکیده
Causal conditional reasoning means drawing inferences from a conditional statement that refers to causal content. It is argued that data on causal conditional reasoning not only tell us something about how people draw deductive inferences from conditionals, but also provide us with information about how they understand causal relations. In particular, three principles emerge from existing data: the modal principle, the exhaustive principle, and the equivalence principle. An experiment sheds new light on how people interpret and use conditionals in causal contexts, and reveals evidence for the proposed representational principles.
منابع مشابه
Pretense, Counterfactuals, and Bayesian Causal Models: Why What Is Not Real Really Matters
Young children spend a large portion of their time pretending about non-real situations. Why? We answer this question by using the framework of Bayesian causal models to argue that pretending and counterfactual reasoning engage the same component cognitive abilities: disengaging with current reality, making inferences about an alternative representation of reality, and keeping this representati...
متن کاملAdopting New International Health Instruments – What Can We Learn From the FCTC?; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
This Commentary forms a response to Nikogosian’s and Kickbusch’s forward-looking perspective about the legal strength of international health instruments. Building on their arguments, in this commentary we consider what we can learn from the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) for the adoption of new legal international health instruments.
متن کاملProbabilistic Reasoning with Naïve Bayes and Bayesian Networks
Bayesian (also called Belief) Networks (BN) are a powerful knowledge representation and reasoning mechanism. BN represent events and causal relationships between them as conditional probabilities involving random variables. Given the values of a subset of these variables (evidence variables) BN can compute the probabilities of another subset of variables (query variables). BN can be created aut...
متن کاملNon-intuitive conditional independence facts hold in models of network data
Many social scientists and researchers across a wide range of fields focus on analyzing a single causal dependency or a conditional model of some outcome variable. However, to reason about interventions or conditional independence, it is useful to construct a joint model of a domain. Researchers in computer science, statistics, and philosophy have developed representations (e.g., Bayesian netwo...
متن کاملCausal Structure in Conditional Reasoning
Causal reasoning has been shown to underlie many aspects of everyday judgment and decision-making. We explore the role of causal structure in conditional reasoning, hypothesizing that people often interpret conditional statements as assertions about causal structure. We argue that responses on the Wason selection task reflect the selection of evidence expected to maximally reduce uncertainty ov...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999